So Seduction Cinema, er, I mean Camp Motion Pictures, oops, I meant Alternative Cinema…crap! So, anyway, Secret Key Motion Pictures, huh? Is that the new Michael Raso flavor of the month? Looks like it and I have to say that I’m not all that happy with it. Seems the folks at Alternative Cinema are taking previous releases, slapping new titles on them and re-releasing them as new features. Don’t believe me? Let’s check the recent roster of Secret Key flicks, shall we? THE BREASTFORD WIVES? Yeah, that’s THE WITCHES OF BREASTWICK. BABES IN KONGLAND? PLANET OF THE EROTIC APE (this particular feature didn’t deserve its initial release let alone a re-release). I could keep going, but what is the point?

So, MISTRESS OF SEDUCTION…I mean DRACULA’S DIRTY DAUGHTER deals with Vamparina, daughter of Count Dracula. She has been chasing the reincarnated soul of the man who put her father to the stake and now, at a college, she is closer than she has ever been before. But now that she has found him, will they be mortal enemies or passionate lovers?

As far as soft-core goes, lots of women rubbing each other and moaning and groaning, I have seen worse. This one is in focus, so that’s a plus. Most of the girls are quite nice to look at, which is another plus. I wonder why the lead of a soft-core feature isn’t required to show us those milky white titties, though. If you were making soft-core vampire lesbian feature, would you not want your star to be showing her boobies in every other scene? I know I would. Sure, there are lots of supporting breasts to throw us off the track, but she’s on screen the most, so why can’t we see them? What a crock.

As with a lot of soft-core features, this one is funny in spots. The lead playing Vamparina is quite good and has a quirky sense of humor. And let’s address the name, shall we? She is constantly bragging how she has been around for centuries, but Vamparina is the best name she can come up with? I doubt that Count Dracula would give her such a lame-ass name.

The rest of the DVD gives us cast auditions. Why? Not sure and pretty lame. The behind-the-scenes stuff is even worse, just shots of them making the movie more than anything else and it's not all that interesting to watch. The one shining spot would be 42nd Street Pete and the stag reel he brings us of this amazing woman from the 60's with a pair of the biggest, all natural tits I have seen in forever. Women were built better back then and this is just cinematic proof of that simple fact. All in all, a fairly watchable flick with lots of pretty naked girls and one good bonus feature. If you never caught this when it was MISTRESS OF SEDUCTION, then this might be a good watch for you, especially if you’re a SCinemax fan.